Effectiveness of The Audit Program, Integrity and The Government Internal Control System on Prevention of Fraud in The Procurement of Goods and Services
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54408/jabter.v1i6.107Keywords:
Effectiveness of Probity Audit, Integrity and Government Internal Control System, Fraud, ProcurementAbstract
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the effectiveness of probity audit, integrity, and the government's internal control system (SPIP) affects fraud in the procurement of goods and services in Serang district. This research uses quantitative methods. The sampling technique uses cluster sampling. The population in this study was a whole local government organization with a total of 27 and each OPD was given 5 questionnaires. The analysis method used in this study is the coefficient of determination method. The data processing process uses SmartPLS software version 3. The type of data used in this study is primary data. Path analysis and bootstrapping technique were used to test the hypothesis. The results of this study show that the effectiveness of the audit probity and the government's internal control system had a positive and significant effect on the prevention of fraud in the procurement of goods and services while for integrity it had no effect and was significant on the prevention of fraud in the procurement of goods and services.
Downloads
References
ACFE Indonesia. (2020). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. Indonesia Chapter #111, 53(9), 1–76. https://acfe-indonesia.or.id/survei-fraud-indonesia/
Ahyar, H. (2020). Buku Metode Penelitian Kualitatif & Kuantitatif.Yogyakarta:CV. Pustaka Ilmu. (Issue March).
Arifin, J., & Hartadi, T. (2020). The implementation of probity audit to prevent fraud in public procurement of goods and services for government agencies. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 24(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol24.iss1.art2
Arifin, Z., Sediati, D. S. R., & Soegianto, S. (2020). Peningkatan Kemampuan Administrasi Tender Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah di Bidang Jasa Konstruksi. Journal of Dedicators Community, 4(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.34001/jdc.v4i2.1097
Aryati, T., & Pangaribuan, L. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Implementasi E-Procurement Dan Kompetensi Pegawai Terhadap Kinerja Pengadaan. Penelitian Dan Karya Ilmiah, 4(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.25105/pdk.v4i1.4012
Avianto, H., Alim, M. N., & Tarjo. (2019). The Effect Of Monopoly Power And Integrity On The Tendency To Commit Fraud In E-Procurement. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21532/apfj.001.19.04.01.14
Bagraff, R. A. (2020). Kompleksitas Kelembagaan dalam Penerapan Probity Audit Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa pada Inspektorat Kabupaten Jombang.
Danuta, K. S. (2017). Crowe’s Fraud Penta-gon Theory dalam Pencegahan Fraud pada Proses Pengadaan melalui E-Procurement. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 1(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.v1i2.826
Dewi, Y. T. T. M., & Muslimin. (2021). Jurnal proaksi. Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kecurangan (Fraud) Pada Sektor Pemerintahan, 8(2), 596–610.
Huda, N., Sadeli, D., & Hermiyetti. (2018). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Sertifikasi Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah untuk Pencegahan Kecurangan (Fraud) pada Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Citra Widya Edukasi, X(3), 243–252.
Hughes, R. (2008). 済無No Title. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 287.
Kementrian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2018). Modul Peningkatan Kapasitas Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah “Belanja Daerah.” Kementrian Keuangan, 51(1), 212.
Kurniawan, D. S. A., Nadirsyah, & Abdullah, S. (2017). Pengaruh Independensi Auditor, Integritas Auditor, Profesionalisme Auditor, Etika Profesi Dan Gaya Kepemimpinan Terhadap Kinerja Auditor Di BPK Perwakilan Provinsi Aceh. Jurnal Magister Akuntansi, 6(3), 49–57.
Lea, et all. (2018). Pengaruh Penerapan E-Procurement SPIP dan Kompetensi SDM terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Barang dan Jasa.
LKPP. (2020). Gambaran Umum Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. 1.
Mulyadi. 2014. Sistem Akuntansi. Cetakan Keempat. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
Nugroho, P. D. W. I. (2020). Mengenal Probity Audit. 17.
Nurchana, A. R. A. (2014). Efektivitas E-Procurement Dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa (Studi Terhadap Penerapan E-Procurement Dalam Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Di Kabupaten Bojonegoro). Jurnal Administrasi Publik Mahasiswa Universitas Brawijaya, 2(2), 355–359.
OECD, 2016, Mencegah Korupsi di Pengadaan publik
Perpres. (2021). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 Tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Republik Indonesia, 086130, 1–47.
Price-waterman, J., Price-waterman, J., Price-waterman, J., Price-waterman, J., & Thornley, M. (2014). Probity Guidelines. May, 0–6.
Peraturan Kepala Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan Nomor PER-362/K/D4/2012 tentang Pedoman Probity audit Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah bagi Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah.
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 54 Tahun 2010 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah.
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 106 Tahun 2007 tentang Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah
Ramadhan, M. S., & hai, J. (2019). Efektivitas Probity Audit Dalam Mencegah Kecurangan Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 10(3), 550–568. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2019.10.3.32
Renaldo Andrew Jusuf, Grace B. Nangoi, J. J. T. (2021). Analisis Pelaksanaan Probity Audit Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Pada Inspektorat Daerah Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Riset Akuntansi Dan Auditing, 12(1), 61–71. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/goodwill/article/view/32556/30795
Robin A. Suryo, A. M. U. (2013). Teori Kontrak dan Implikasinya Terhadap Regulasi Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Jurnal Pengadaan, 3(3), 1–21.
Rodliyah, M. (2016). Estimated Score Factor With Partial Least Square (Pls) on Measurement Model. 37–42.
Romaissah, Imtikhanah, S., & Hidayah, R. (2019). Pengaruh Implementasi Sistem E-Procurement dan Pengendalian Internal Terhadap Pencegahan Fraud Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Jurnal Neraca, 65–80.
Sari, R. I., Islamiati, D., Akuntansi, J., & Sriwijaya, P. N. (2021). PENGARUH EFEKTIVITAS PENCEGAHAN FRAUD PENGADAAN BARANG / JASA. 5(1).
Schillemans, T., & van Twist, M. (2016). Coping with Complexity: Internal Audit and Complex Governance. Public Performance and Management Review, 40(2), 257–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1197133
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Thompson, N., Ravindran, R., & Nicosia, S. (2015). Government data does not mean data governance: Lessons learned from a public sector application audit. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.001
Usman, F. (2017). Evaluasi Kesesuaian Pelaksanaan Probity Audit Pada Bpkp Pusat Dengan Pedoman Probity Audit Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Info Artha, 1(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.31092/jia.v1i1.17
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The FWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. (2004) ‘The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud: Certified Public Accountant’, The CPA Journal, 74(12), pp. 38–42. doi: DOI:raud Diamond : Considering the Four ElemWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Daning Ayu Ningsih, Helmi Yazid, Dadan Ramdhani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
