The Effect of Audit Reports and KAP Measurements on The Relevance of The Value Accounting Information

Authors

  • Windi Nawati Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Tubagus Ismail Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
  • Munawar Muclish Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54408/jabter.v2i1.108

Keywords:

Audit Reports, KAP Measurement, Relevance of the value accounting information

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine The Effect of Audit Reports and KAP Measurements on The Relevance of The Value Accounting Information in banking companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange 2016-2020. The sample used in this study is 10 pharmacy companies. The data used is secondary data. The data analysis technique used is quantitative. Structural Equation Modeling is used as an analysis with the help of Smart SPSS software version 23.

Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the first audit report has a significant positive effect on book value per share. Second, the audit report has a significant positive effect on the value of earnings per share. Third, KAP size has a significant positive effect on book value per share. Fourth, the size of KAP has a significant positive effect on the value of earnings per share.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Thuneibat, A.A., Khamees, B.A. and Al-Fayoumi, N.A. (2008), “The effect of qualified auditors’ opinions on share prices: evidence from Jordan”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 84-101.

Almutairi, A.R., Dunn, K.A. and Scants, T. (2009), “Auditor tenure, auditor specialization, and Information asymmetry”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 24 No. 7, pp. 600-623.

Ameen, E.C., Chan, K. and Guffey, D.M. (1994), “Information content of qualified audit opinions for over-the-counter firms”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 21 No. 7, pp. 997-1011.

Barth, M.E., Beaver, W.H. and Landsman, W.R. (2001), “The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 31 Nos 1-3, pp. 77-104.

Bauman, M.P. (1996), “A review of fundamental analysis research in accounting”, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 2-10.

Bauwhede, H.V. and Willekens, M. (2004), “Evidence on (the lack of) audit-quality differentiation in the private client segment of the Belgian audit market”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 501-522.

Boone, J., Khurana, I. and Raman, K. (2010), “Do the Big 4 and the Second tier firms provide audits of similar quality?”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 29, pp. 330-352.

Chen, Y.-S., Liu, Y.-P. and Chien, C.-Y. (2009), “The association between auditor quality and human capital”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 523-541.

Craswell, A., Stokes, D.J. and Laughton, J. (2002), “Auditor independence and fee dependence”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 253-275.

Davidson, R.A. and Neu, D. (1993), “A note on the association between audit firm size and audit quality”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 479-488.

DeAngelo, L.E. (1981), “Auditor size and audit quality”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 183-199.

Dhaliwal, D.S., Lamoreaux, P.T., Litov, L.P. and Neyland, J.B. (2016), “Shared auditors in mergers and acquisitions”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 61 No. 1, pp. 49-76.

Dodd, P., Dopuch, N., Holthausen, R. and Leftwich, R. (1984), “Qualified audit opinions and stock prices”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 3-38.

Dopuch, N. and Simunic, D. (1982). “Competition in auditing: an assessment”, in Fourth Symposium on Auditing Research, Vol. 401, Urbana, IL, University of Illinois, p. 405.

Dopuch, N., Holthausen, R.W. and Leftwich, R.W. (1986), “Abnormal stock returns associated with media disclosures of ‘subject to’qualified audit opinions”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 93-117.

Dumontier, P. and Raffournier, B. (2002), “Accounting and capital markets: a survey of the European evidence”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 119-151.

Hakim, F. and Omri, M.A. (2010). “Quality of the external auditor, information asymmetry, and bidask spread: case of the listed Tunisian firms”, International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 5-18.

Hope, O.K., Langli, J.C. and Thomas, W.B. (2012), “Agency conflicts and auditing in private firms”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 37 No. 7, pp. 500-517.

International Accounting Standards Board (2013), International Financial Reporting Standards, 6th ed., București, CECCAR, pp. A21- A29.

Ireland, J.C. (2003), “An empirical investigation of determinants of audit reports in the UK”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 30 Nos 7-8, pp. 975-1016.

Kargin, S. (2013), “The impact of IFRS on the value relevance of accounting information: evidence from Turkish firms”, International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 71-81.

Lai, S.M. and Liu, C.L. (2018), “The effect of auditor characteristics on the value of diversification”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 115-137.

Lambert, R., Leuz, C. and Verrecchia, R. (2007), “Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 31, pp. 385-420.

Lawrence, A., Minutti-Meza, M. and Zhang, P. (2011), “Can Big 4 versus non-Big 4 differences in auditquality proxies be attributed to client characteristics?”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 86 No. 1, pp. 259-286.

Lee, H.L. and Lee, H. (2013), “The value relevance of summarized accounting information and audit quality”, Working paper in Second International Conference of the Japanese Accounting Review Presented, doi: 10.1596/1813-9450-5732.

Maigoshi, Z.S., Latif, R.A. and Kamardin, H. (2018), “Change in value- relevance of disclosed RPT across accounting regimes: evidence from Malaysia”, Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 44, pp. 422-433.

Mansi, S.A., Maxwell, W.F. and Miller, D.P. (2004), “Does auditor quality and tenure matter to investors? Evidence from the bond market”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 755-793.

Mark, A., Christopher, K.M. and Woon, K. (2009), “Auditor quality and the role of accounting information in explaining UK stock returns”, Cardiff Economics Working Papers.

Moradi, M., Salehi, M., Rigi, M. and Moeinizade, M. (2011), “The effect of qualified audit report on share prices returns: evidence of Iran”, African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 5 No. 8, pp. 3354-3360.

Mutchler, J.F. (1985), “A multivariate analysis of the auditor’s going- concern opinion decision”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 668-682.

large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 375-400.

Robu, M.A. and Robu, I.B. (2015), “The influence of the audit report on the relevance of accounting information reported by listed Romanian companies”, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 20, pp. 562-570.

Rusmin, R. (2010), “Auditor quality and earnings management: Singaporean evidence”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 25 No. 7, pp. 618-38.

Salehi, M., Fakhri Mahmoudi, M.R. and Daemi Gah, A. (2019), “A meta- analysis approach for determinants of effective factors on audit quality: evidence from emerging market”, Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 287-312.

Shamki, D. and Abdul Rahman, A. (2013), “Does financial disclosure influence the value relevance of accounting information?”, Education Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, Vol. 6 Nos 3-4, pp. 216-232.

Skinner, D.J. and Srinivasan, S. (2012), “Audit quality and auditor reputation: evidence from Japan”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 87 No. 5, pp. 1737-1765.

Scott, William R, 200 9. Financial Accounting Theory . Fifth Edition. Canada Prentice Hall.

Tlili, M., Ben Othman, H. and Hussainey, K. (2019), “Does integrated reporting enhance the value relevance of organizational capital? Evidence from the South African context”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 642-661.

Tshipa, J., Brummer, L., Wolmarans, H. and Du Toit, E. (2018), “The impact of flexible corporate governance disclosures on value relevance. Empirical evidence from South Africa”, Corporate Governance, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 369-385.

Watkins, A.L., Hillison, W. and Morecroft, S.E. (2004), “Audit quality: a synthesis of theory and empirical evidence”, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 23, pp. 153-193.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-24

How to Cite

Nawati, W., Ismail, T., & Muclish, M. (2022). The Effect of Audit Reports and KAP Measurements on The Relevance of The Value Accounting Information . Journal of Applied Business, Taxation and Economics Research, 2(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.54408/jabter.v2i1.108