The Cooperative Taxation Controversy : a Conceptual and an Econometric Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54408/jabter.v2i1.114Keywords:
Cooperatives, taxation, tax exemption, theories, econometric model , STATA SoftwareAbstract
Cooperatives are an integral and an essential part of the social and solidarity economy, as it has a dual role by contributing greatly to the local socio-economic development. Thereby, these social entities are considered as tools to satisfy the economic and the social Society’s needs. Thus, the cooperatives are subject to several legal restrictions and constraints in relation to the nature of the activity exercised, compared to the counterpart entities. Moreover, to overcome these compulsions, most of government grants these social entities a set of taxes grace. Nevertheless, the activity expansion of certain cooperatives has aroused the demonstration of its competitors arguing that these tax exemptions leads to unfair competition, in return the cooperatives subject to this claim, defend their position by affirming that their activity generate certainly profits, but it contribute greatly to the social aspect. Therefore, the present research consisted in the study of the taxation’s effect on dairy processing cooperatives in Morocco at the commercial, financial and social level in order to resolve this taxation controversy. Thereby, this study was carried out according to a quantitative study on the leading cooperatives of the dairy sector in Morocco, by using the econometric software STATA on the basis of the conceptual and the econometric model appropriate to the research theme.
Downloads
References
Atkinson, R. (1990). Altruism in nonprofit organizations. BCL Rev., 31(3), 501.
Atkinson, R. (1997). Theories of the Federal Income Tax Exemption for Charities: Thesis, Antithesis, and Syntheses. Stetson L. Rev., 27, 395.
Bank, S. A. (2005). A Capital Lock-In Theory of the Corporate Income Tax. Geo. LJ, 94, 889.
Bittker, B. I., & Rahdert, G. K. (1976). The exemption of nonprofit organizations from federal income taxation. The Yale Law Journal, 85(3), 299–358.
Brennen, D. A. (2006). A Diversity Theory of Charitable Tax Exemption - Beyond Efficiency, Through Critical Race Theory, Toward Diversity. Pittsburgh Tax Review, 51.
Caceres, R. C., & Vanhamme, J. (2003). Les processus modérateurs et médiateurs: distinction conceptuelle, aspects analytiques et illustrations. Recherche et Applications En Marketing (French Edition), 18(2), 67–100.
Chaffee, E. C. (2016). Collaboration Theory: A Theory of the Charitable Tax-Exempt Nonprofit Corporation. UC Davis Law Review, 49(5), 59.
Chang, C. F., & Tuckman, H. P. (1990). Do higher property tax rates increase the market share of nonprofit hospitals? National Tax Journal, 175–187.
Crimm, N. J. (1998). An explanation of the federal income tax exemption for charitable organizations : A theory of risk compensation. Florida Law Review, 50, 42.
D’haultfœuille, X., & Givord, P. (2014). La régression quantile en pratique. Economie et Statistique, 471(1), 85–111.
Evrard, Y., Pras, B., Roux, E., Desmet, P., Dussaix, A.-M., & Lilien, G. L. (2003). Market-Fondements et méthodes des recherches en marketing.
Fricke, M. (2015). The Case Against Income Tax Exemption for Nonprofits. . . John’s L. Rev., 89, 1129.
Gavard-Perret, M.-L., Gotteland, D., Haon, C., & Jolibert, A. (2008). Méthodologie de la recherche. Editions Pearson Education France.
Gujarati, D. N., Porter, D. C., & Gunasekar, S. (2003). Basic econometrics. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Gulley, O. D., & Santerre, R. E. (1993). The effect of tax exemption on the market share of nonprofit hospitals. National Tax Journal, 477–486.
Hackney, P. T. (2013). What We Talk About When We Talk About Tax Exemption. Va. Tax Rev., 33, 115.
Hall, M. A., & Colombo, J. D. (1991). The donative theory of the charitable tax exemption. Ohio St. LJ, 52, 1379.
Hansmann, H. (1981). The rationale for exempting nonprofit organizations from corporate income taxation. The Yale Law Journal, 91(1), 54–100.
Hansmann, H. (1987). The effect of tax exemption and other factors on the market share of nonprofit versus for-profit firms. National Tax Journal, XL, 71–82.
Janssen, F. (2004). L’interchangeabilité des critères de conceptualisation de la croissance : étude empirique. IAG - LSM Working Papers, 04/118, 20.
Lafleur, M., & Merrien, A.-M. (n.d.). Impact socio-économique des coopératives et des mutuelles Quand le passé inspire le futur : contribution des coopératives et des mutuelles à un monde meilleur.
Moungou, S. P. (2005). La croissance de l’entreprise. Le cas des industries agroalimentaire de l’économie camerounaise.
Mullner, R., & Hadley, J. (1984). Interstate Variations in the Growth of Chain-Owned Proprietary Hospitals, 1973—1982. Inquiry, 144–151.
Reijonen, H., & Komppula, R. (2007). Perception of success and its effect on small firm performance. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(4), 689–701.
Saemundsson, R. (2003). Entrepreneurship, Technology, and the Growth Process: A study of young, medium-sized technology-based firms. Department of Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology.
Thietart, R.-A. (2014). Méthodes de recherche en management-4ème édition. Dunod.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Khadija Rhaddioui, Said Ahrouch
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.