Turnaround Initiatives and Going Concern Opinion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54408/jabter.v1i2.28Keywords:
Going Concern Opinion, Financial Distress, Turnaround Initiatives, Positive Information.Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to examine the role of Statement on Auditing Standards (PSA) No. 30 which requires an independent auditor to evaluate management actions to overcome the financial distress of the company to reduce the possibility of going concern opinion acceptance. Implementation of turnaround initiatives consists of additional capital, borrowing and debt restructuring, asset sales and cost reduction activities. The population of this research is 454 manufacturing companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange during 2011-2013. This study finds that borrowing and debt restructuring are positive information which reduces the probability of receiving going concern opinions. Whereas, cost reduction is the negative information that increases the probability of receiving going concern opinion. That shows there is no significant effect of withdrawal of capital and asset sales activities on the probability of going concern opinion acceptance.
Downloads
References
Abbot, Parker dan Peters, 2003. “The Effects of Post-Bankruptcy Financing on going concern Reporting.” Advances in Accounting, Vol. 20, No. 8, pp. 1–22.
AICPA. 1988. The Auditor’s Considerations of an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going-Concern. Statement on Auditing Standards No.59. Auditing Standards Board (ASB).
Arens. 2012. Auditing and assurance services: an integrated approach. Pearson Education : New Jersey.
Behn, Carcello, Hermanson dan Hermanson 1999. “Client Satisfaction and Big Six Audit Fees”. Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 16, No.4, pp. 587-608.
Barker III, V.L.,dan Duhaime,M.L. .1997. “Strategic change in the turnaround process : theory and empirical evidence” . Strategic Management Journal , Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 13-38.
Brigham dan Houston, 2006. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Bruynseels dan Willekens. 2006. “Strategic Viability and Going-Concern Auidit Opinion.” Marleen.willekens@econ.kuleuven.be.
_____ 2012. “The Effect Of Strategic And Operating Turnaround Initiatives On Audit Reporting For Distressed Companies.” Accounting Organizations and Society, Vol. 37, No. 37, pp. 223–241.
Carcello dan Neal. 2000. “Audit committee composition and auditor reporting.” The Accounting Review, Vol. 75, No. 4, pp. 453–467.
Charmechael dan Pany.(1993. Reporting on uncertainties, including going concern: The expectation gap standards proceedings of the expectation gap, roundtable. New York: AICPA.
Carson, Fargher, Geiger, Lennox, Raghunandan dan Willekens. 2013. “Audit Reporting for Going-Concern Uncertainty: A Research Synthesis." Journal of Practice & Theory American Accounting Association, Vol. 32, No .1, pp. 353 -384.
Chen dan Church. 1996. “Going Concern Opinions and The Market’s Reaction to Bankruptcy Fillings.” The Accounting Review, Vol. 71. No. 1, pp. 117 - 128.
Dhillon dan Ramirez. 1998. “Debtor-in-possession financing and the resolution of uncertainty in (Chap. 11) reorganizations.” Working Paper, Tulane University, New Orleans.
Elayan dan Meyer. 2001. “The impact of receiving debtor-in-possession financing on the probability of successful emergence and time spent under (Chap. 11) bankruptcy.” Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, Vol. 28, No. 7, pp. 905–942.
Eisenhardt. 1989. “Agency Theory :An Assesment and Review.” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 57 – 74.
Ghozali Imam. 2012. Aplikasi Analisis Mutivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit UNDIP : Semarang.
Gilson. 1990. “Bankruptcy. boards. banks and bondholders-Evidence on changes in corporate ownership and control when firms default.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 27, pp 355-387.
Gujarati. 2008. Basic Econometrics. New York : Mc-Grawhill.
Hackenbrack, K., dan Nelson,W.M. 1996.”Auditor’s incentives and their application of financial accounting standards”. The Accounting Review. 71 (January) : 43-59.
Hofer,C.W. 1980. “Turnaround Strategies.” Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 19-31.
Haron et. al. 2009. “Factors Influencing Auditors' Going Concern Opinion.”Asian Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 1–19.
Ikatan Akuntansi Indonesia. 2011. Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
James. 1933. "The Modern Corporation and Private Property, by Adolf A. Berle Jr. and Gardiner C. Means." Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 8, No 8, pp. 514 – 516.
Jensen dan Meckling. 1976. “Theory Of The Firm :Managerial Behavior. Agency Cost And Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No.4, pp. 305 - 360.
Jensen dan Smith. 1984. Modern Theory of Corporate Finance. New York : McGrow-Hill.Inc.
Kaplan dan William. 2012. “The Changing Relationship Between Audit firm Size And Going Concern Reporting.” Accounting, Organizations and Society. Vol. 37, pp. 322–341.
Keputusan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 1002/KMK.04/1984. Tentang penentuan perbandingan antara hutang dan modal sendiri untuk keperluan pengenaan pajak penghasilan. Available at: http://www.google.co.id.
Kevin, Lam dan Mensah. 2006. “Auditor’s Decision-Making Under Going-Concern Uncertaintes In Low Litigation-Risk Environments: Evidence from Hongkong.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 25, pp. 706 –739
Koh dan Tan. 1999. “A Neural Network Approach to the Prediction of Going concern Status.” Accounting and Bussines Research, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 211-216.
Mutchler. 1985. “A multivariate analysis of the auditor’s going concern opinion decision. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.23, pp. 668 – 682.
Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor: 43/KMK.017/1997. Tentang Jasa Akuntan Publik. Available at: http://www.google.co.id.
Petronela. 2004. “Perkembangan Going concern Perusahaan Dalam Pemberian Opini Audit.” Jurnal Balance.
Paquette dan Skender. 1996. “Using bankruptcy Model In The Auditing Course: The Evaluation Of Company as Going Concern. Journal Of Accounting Education, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 319 - 329.
Pearce II., Robinson,A.J dan Richard.B. 2003. Strategic Management : Formulation, Implementation and Control. Eight Edition. Mc.Graw-Hill Companies,Inc. New York.
Praptitorini dan Januarti. 2011. “Analisis Pengaruh Kualitas Audit. Debt Default Dan Opinion Shopping Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Going Concern.” Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 78 – 93.
PSA No.30. Pertimbangan Auditor Atas Kemampuan Entitas Dalam Mempertahankan Kelangsungan Hidupnya.
Ramadhany. Alexander. 2004. “Analisis Faktor – Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penerimaan Opini Audit Going concern pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang mengalami Financial Distress di Bursa Efek Jakarta.” Jurnal Maksi Vol 4.
Ross. 1977. The Determination of financial structure : The Incentive signaling Approach. Bell Journal of Economics 8.
Santoso dan Wedari. 2007. “Analisis Faktor - Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Opini Audit dan Going concern. JAAI , Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 141 – 158.
Sawir. 2004. Analisis Kinerja Keuangan dan Perencanaan Keuangan Perusahaan. Gramedia : Jakarta.
Schendel,D.,Paton,R.G. dan Riggs,J.1976. “Corporate Turnaround Strategies: A Study of Profit Decline and Recovery”. Journal of General Management, Vol.76, No.3, pp. 3-11.
Suwarsono, M. 2004. Manajemen Strategik, Konsep dan Kasus. Unit Penerbit dan Percetakan , Akademi Manajemen Perusahaan YKPN.
Setyarno dan Januarti. 2006. Pengaruh Kualitas Audit. Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan. Opini audit tahun sebelumnya. Pertumbuhan Perusahaan terhadap Opini Going Concern. SNA 9 Padang. Agustus.
Setyowati. 2013. “Strategi Manajemen Berbasis Keuangan Sebagai Faktor Mitigasi Dalam Penerimaan Keputusan Opini Going Concern”. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Vol. n.d, No 1, pp. 063 – 075.
Swanson dan Seetharaman. 2003. The Capital Structure Paradigm. Praeger : London.
Tarigan. 2010. Values Driven Accounting (ACC V.2). Gramedia : Jakarta.
Venuti. 2007. “The Going concern Assumption Revisited Assessing a Company’s Future Viability.” The CPA Journal. Vol. 74, No. 5. Pp. 40-43.
Vanasco. 1994). "The Audit Committee: An International Perspective". Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 9, No. 8, pp. 18 - 42
Young dan Wang. 2010. “Multi-risk level examination of going concern modifications.” Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 756 – 791.
Zhang dan Zhou. 2007. “Audit committee quality. auditor independence. and internal control weaknesses.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 26, pp. 300 – 327.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Chandra Prasadhita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
